CA: First Public Database of CA Police Officer Misconduct Records Unveiled

Source: filtermag.org 8/5/25

Seven years in the making, a searchable database of California law enforcement misconduct and use-of-force reports is now available to the public. The free database contains records from close to 12,000 cases and 700 police departments, shining a light into the practices of what has long been among the least transparent states in the country when it comes to officer misconduct.

The state-funded Police Records Access Project was created by the California Reporting Project, a team spearheaded by journalists and data scientists from Stanford University and the University of California, Berkeley. The database was jointly published August 4 by CalMatters, KQED, the San Francisco Chronicle and the Los Angeles Times.

In 2018 California passed the Right to Know Act, which made certain types of police records subject to disclosure via public records requests. Though groundbreaking, it was limited to misconduct cases involving shootings, sexual assault or dishonesty that interfered with investigations. In 2021 the state passed legislation that made additional types of records subject to disclosure, including those related to excessive force, unlawful searches and engaging in prejudice or discrimination. But now, the public can use the new database to search hundreds of departments across the state at once.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I wonder how long before they shut this down for safety reasons when some citizen decides to take it upon themselves to dispense additional “justice”?

Just like the national database of the same consideration is finally open for business…as it should be for those in positions of trust who abuse it the same.

“Info was redacted to protect………”
But they don’t mind printing every bit of info about us, do they.
This is as much a waste of time and money as the registry is. We are currently in an Authoritarian Police country. I don’t fear the police, I reject them. Just like I don’t fear Trump or anything he tries. They want you to be afraid. When you have had your rights taken away, then fear is no longer an emotion you experience.

While I believe our information should be private, I am really glad some other “criminals” have their info out there, I highly doubt you will find their address listed, or their vehicles listed. But I hope they get ****!

Where are they allowed to live? seems that they are a danger for young and old. However, personally I think registries should never be allowed period.

Does a lifetime ban working in LE, security guard, funeral escort, or any other position of authority follow them across the country? Once a dirty cop, always a dirty cop.